|
Annex 4: Revised Sector Performance Milestones and Targets: 2006 - 2010
Table I: Equitable Access
| Indicator |
Actual |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Source of Data |
| 2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
| |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
| Net Admission rate |
81.0% |
79.5% |
82.5% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
92% |
92% |
93% |
93% |
94% |
94% |
95% |
95% |
EMIS |
| Net enrolment ratio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Primary: nationwide |
91.9% |
90.7% |
93.1% |
92% |
91% |
93% |
93% |
92% |
94% |
94% |
95% |
95% |
96% |
96% |
EMIS |
| Primary: urban area |
91.6% |
90.4% |
92.8% |
95% |
94% |
96% |
97% |
96% |
98% |
98% |
99% |
98% |
100% |
100% |
|
| Primary: rural area |
92.4% |
91.2% |
93.5% |
92% |
91% |
93% |
93% |
92% |
94% |
94% |
95% |
95% |
96% |
96% |
|
| Primary: remote area |
82.5% |
79.4% |
85.4% |
84% |
81% |
86% |
85% |
83% |
87% |
85% |
90% |
89% |
92% |
92% |
|
| Lower secondary: nationwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lower secondary: urban |
41.3% |
40.5% |
42.1% |
45.0% |
44.4% |
45.7% |
48.8% |
48.3% |
52.5% |
52.2% |
56.3% |
56.1% |
60% |
60% |
|
| Lower secondary: rural area |
23.7% |
22.2% |
25.1% |
29.0% |
27.8% |
30.2% |
34.2% |
33.3% |
39.5% |
38.9% |
44.7% |
44.4% |
50% |
50% |
|
| Lower secondary: remote area |
3.9% |
4.1% |
3.8% |
11.1% |
11.3% |
11.0% |
18.3% |
18.5% |
25.6% |
25.6% |
32.8% |
32.8% |
40% |
40% |
|
Upper secondary |
9.30% |
7.90% |
10.60% |
10.0% |
8.6% |
11.4% |
14.0% |
11.0% |
18.0% |
15.0% |
23.0% |
20.0% |
28% |
25% |
|
Transition rate (03-04) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMIS |
To lower secondary |
81.9% |
79.6% |
83.9% |
87% |
85% |
89% |
90% |
88% |
93% |
90% |
95% |
93% |
97% |
95% |
To upper secondary. |
56.1% |
58.0% |
54.9% |
64% |
66% |
62% |
65% |
67% |
71% |
71% |
75% |
74% |
78% |
76% |
Number of students in public higher education institutions |
7,963 |
2,802 |
5,161 |
20,000 |
6,000 |
14,000 |
24,000 |
7,500 |
28,000 |
9,000 |
32,000 |
10,500 |
36,000 |
12,000 |
Higher Ed. Dep. |
Number of scholarship students |
… |
… |
… |
8,500 |
3,000 |
5500 |
9,000 |
3,500 |
10,000 |
4,000 |
12,000 |
6,000 |
15,000 |
7,500 |
Number of private supported students in higher education |
38,882 |
12,685 |
26,197 |
49,000 |
10,800 |
5,500 |
50,000 |
14,000 |
51,400 |
21,000 |
52,700 |
24,000 |
54,000 |
24,000 |
Higher Ed. Dep. |
Number of students in teacher training |
6,520 |
2,512 |
4,008 |
10,000 |
3,600 |
6,400 |
10,000 |
3,700 |
10,000 |
3,800 |
10,000 |
3,900 |
10,000 |
4,000 |
TTD |
Proportion of 6-14 years old out of school |
12.1% |
16.1% |
8.2% |
11.24 |
13.88 |
7.5 |
10.2 |
10.5 |
9.4 |
9.2 |
8.6 |
8.4 |
8 |
7.6 |
EMIS |
Number of students enrolled in re-entry program in grades 3-9 |
19,476 |
25,000 |
25,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
NFE |
Number of students enrolled in equivalency program |
5,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
30,000 |
NFE |
Number of students enrolled in literacy, life-skills and income generation programs |
112,557 |
120,000 |
120,000 |
120,000 |
120,000 |
120,000 |
NFE |
Table II: Quality and Efficiency (Promotion and repetition 2003-04 rate are used for baseline 2004-05)
| Indicator |
Baseline |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Source: |
| 2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
Pupil teacher ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMIS |
- Primary |
53.5 |
51.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
50.0 |
|
- Lower Secondary |
27.7 |
37 |
41 |
45 |
45 |
45 |
|
- Upper Secondary |
29.4 |
35 |
38 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
|
Promotion rate |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
EMIS |
- Grade 1 |
64.8% |
65.4% |
64.2% |
92% |
92% |
92% |
93% |
93% |
94% |
94% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
|
- Grade 3 |
77.3% |
78.9% |
75.7% |
93% |
93% |
93% |
93% |
93% |
94% |
94% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
|
- Grade 6 |
86.6% |
86.3% |
86.9% |
93% |
93% |
93% |
93% |
93% |
94% |
94% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
|
Repetition rate |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
EMIS |
- Grade 1 |
23.6% |
22.4% |
24.9% |
6% |
6% |
6% |
5% |
5% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
|
- Grade 3 |
13.2% |
11.3% |
15.4% |
6% |
6% |
6% |
5% |
5% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
|
- Grade 6 |
2.6% |
2.2% |
3.1% |
2% |
2% |
2% |
2% |
2% |
2% |
2% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
1% |
|
Completion rate |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Male |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
Total |
Female |
EMIS |
- Primary |
46.8% |
45.7% |
47.9% |
60% |
60% |
60% |
70% |
70% |
80% |
80% |
90% |
90% |
100% |
100% |
|
- Lower secondary |
20.6% |
20.0% |
21.2% |
30% |
30% |
30% |
40% |
40% |
50% |
50% |
60% |
60% |
75% |
75% |
|
Literacy rate |
67.1% |
60.3% |
74.7% |
70% |
67% |
73.1% |
75% |
73% |
80% |
78% |
85% |
84% |
90% |
90% |
|
Expenditure on core instructional materials per pupil (Riels) |
… |
5,800 |
6,300 |
6,800 |
7,000 |
7,200 |
|
Textbook pupil ratio in primary
(total textbooks of all subjects/pupil) |
2.7 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
EMIS |
Number of incomplete primary schools |
1,934 |
1,800
(donor support
required) |
1,500
(donor support required) |
1,000
(donor support required) |
500
(donor support required) |
0 |
EMIS |
% of primary teachers completed lower secondary |
93.2 |
93.4 |
93.6 |
93.9 |
94.1 |
94.3 |
HRMIS |
Number of new remote/difficult teacher postings as percentage of new postings |
- |
70% |
70% |
95% |
95% |
95% |
HRMIS |
Number of students passing grade 12 examination |
33,834 |
37,500 |
40,000 |
50,000 |
60,000 |
70,000 |
EMIS |
% of students meeting curriculum standards in Khmer Language based on standardized test at: |
… |
… |
80% |
80% |
82% |
85% |
|
- Grade 3 |
|
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
|
- Grade 6 |
|
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
|
- Grade 9 |
|
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
to be determined |
|
% of students meeting curriculum standards in Mathematics based on standardized test at: |
… |
… |
80% |
80% |
82% |
85% |
|
- Grade 3 |
|
to be determined |
|
|
|
|
|
- Grade 6 |
|
to be determined |
|
|
|
|
|
- Grade 9 |
|
to be determined |
|
|
|
|
|
% of accredited public/private HE institutions |
… |
15% |
30% |
45% |
65% |
80% |
|
No. of schools/TTCs with new science and ICT facilities |
… |
10 |
25 |
50 |
75 |
100 |
|
Table III: Institutional Development and Capacity Building
| Indicator |
Baseline |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Target |
Source: |
| 2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Education share of total government recurrent budget |
17.49% |
19.5% |
18.5% |
18.5% |
19.0% |
20.0% |
20.0% |
|
Non personnel share of total recurrent spending |
43.25% |
40.0% |
38.8% |
37.5% |
33.0% |
33.0% |
30.8% |
FMIS |
% of actual education expenditure vs total education budget allocation |
26.91% |
29.0% |
33.26% |
28.32% |
28.18% |
25.21% |
25.02% |
FMIS |
% of actual PAP expenditure vs total PAP budget |
|
93% |
95% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
FMIS |
Expenditure on monitoring of PAP in billion Riels |
3.6 |
6.8 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
|
Disbursement rate for recurrent priority programs |
96% |
93% |
95% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
Number of operational BMCs |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PFMIS |
- % of BMCs with trained accountancy staff |
20% |
40% |
60% |
80% |
100% |
100% |
|
- % of BMCs with ICT-based MIS |
40% |
60% |
80% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
- % of BMCs subject to internal audit annually |
|
30% |
40% |
50% |
66% |
80% |
100% |
PFMIS |
- % of schools/institutions audited annually |
5% |
8% |
10% |
10% |
15% |
20% |
|
Non teaching staff share of total education sector workforce |
|
16% |
15% |
15% |
13% |
12% |
12% |
HRMIS |
No. of remote teachers with housing assistance |
|
1,000 |
2,000 |
3,000 |
4,000 |
5,000 |
6,000 |
HRMIS |
% of remote teachers with housing assistance |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
| Technical assistance (person-month) |
|
(national/ international combined) 542*
|
487.8 |
at least 10% reduction from previous year
|
at least 10% reduction from previous year |
at least 10% reduction from previous year
|
at least 10% reduction from previous year
|
AMIS |
- National |
|
Donors' report |
- International |
|
|
% of female education staff: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HRMIS |
- Teaching staff |
|
40.1% |
42.1% |
44.1% |
46.0% |
48.0% |
50% |
EMIS |
- Middle management (directors & deputy directors of provincial and central departments) ** |
|
10.4% |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
|
- Top leaders (deputy director general and above positions) ** |
|
3.0% |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
TBD |
|
* The total person-months of newly committed TA in 2004. Source: Donors' report 2005.
** Concrete target will be determined in the Gender Mainstream Action Plan 2006-2010 to be developed in 2006.
|